Practicing on the newly dead
Rosemary Flanigan
December 11, 2008
When we “argue” (discuss?) at an ethics consult, we find ourselves sometimes arguing about erroneous conscience decisions, I think.
FOR EXAMPLE, let’s say as an intern, a physician may have practiced intubation on a newly dead patient without family consent. Years later, in retrospect, the physician may have arrived at the judgment that this was wrong to do and that he/she will teach medical students not to do it.
AH HA!!! So medicine needs to be practiced, and this particular procedure probably needs a lot of practice. What would lead the physician to see that such “practicing” was not a good thing?
What about the physician who doesn’t need to practice anymore—but still sees that practicing on the newly dead is better than not practicing at all so he/she does not teach medical students to avoid doing so?
Would you argue with this physician?
To share your comments, click here.
December 11, 2008
When we “argue” (discuss?) at an ethics consult, we find ourselves sometimes arguing about erroneous conscience decisions, I think.
FOR EXAMPLE, let’s say as an intern, a physician may have practiced intubation on a newly dead patient without family consent. Years later, in retrospect, the physician may have arrived at the judgment that this was wrong to do and that he/she will teach medical students not to do it.
AH HA!!! So medicine needs to be practiced, and this particular procedure probably needs a lot of practice. What would lead the physician to see that such “practicing” was not a good thing?
What about the physician who doesn’t need to practice anymore—but still sees that practicing on the newly dead is better than not practicing at all so he/she does not teach medical students to avoid doing so?
Would you argue with this physician?
To share your comments, click here.
Labels: clinical and organizational ethics, ethics committees, medical ethics
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home