Ethics of Refusing Informed Consent II
This is a followup to a blog post from last week.
L2
In this case, there were a variety of compelling reasons to over-ride the patient's refusal of care. First, this was a very serious, irrevocable decision. It was life-or-death, decide now, no takebacks. You can always withdraw care later, but you can't re-animate the dead if you change your mind. And, um, you can't change your mind if you're dead. The context argued for full treatment.
For more click here.
L2
In this case, there were a variety of compelling reasons to over-ride the patient's refusal of care. First, this was a very serious, irrevocable decision. It was life-or-death, decide now, no takebacks. You can always withdraw care later, but you can't re-animate the dead if you change your mind. And, um, you can't change your mind if you're dead. The context argued for full treatment.
For more click here.
Labels: medical ethics; consent; bioethics; end of life; patient autonomy
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home